
Kriss is excited (albeit very cold) about getting baptized.

Welcome to The Loop - a Journey extension. The Journey is an independent, non-denominational church located in Rochester, NH, affiliated with the Baptist Bible Fellowship and the Willow Creek Association. Although our main site is www.thejourneynh.com, The Loop contains a weekly diary of our Sunday services, thoughts and ramblings of our pastor, event pictures, and feedback from various members and friends.
Kevin Winter / Getty Images file |
“Would you have made the film if September 11 had not happened?” the reporter asked.
“Probably not,” replied Spielberg, who added that the film is coming “at a time when Americans feel deeply vulnerable.”
“Won’t this film actually heighten that sense of vulnerability?”
“It probably will,” said Spielberg, who then hedged a bit.
The testy exchange also extended to a discussion of Tom Cruise’s religion, Scientology, which is considered highly suspect in Germany.
Then the reporter even asked Spielberg if he felt guilty for taking the fun out of swimming because people were afraid of water after his 1975 blockbuster “Jaws.”
“Not at all!” Spielberg replied. “On the contrary, I was impishly pleased. The reactions of the public showed me that the film worked and was touching the primeval fears of the audience.”
**********************************
I have a hard time with this. Playing on fears is one thing, but making a film that will make people more on edge than most already are in this society is (in my opinion) wrong. I believe that films that lend to a heightened awareness are good, and films that help people relieve stress or forget about the current news are fine, but to me, there is something morally wrong with making a film that will only increase phobias and that will be a detriment to society. I know this also disqualifies other films, but for some reason, this just really irritates me.
I'd be interested in hearing any thoughts. I am just processing this info...